We who are not subjected to Jean Claude Arnault
Jean Claude Arnault accused in DN, november 2017, of raping, abused and harassed women. Note! It was in November 2017. I december 2017 – Thus, in December – began an investigation of Stockholm police. Six months later, in mid-June 2018 Formal charges were brought on suspicion of rape. Do you think justice grind at a good pace? So it took a half years of the Jean Claude notified and the investigation was started until the indictment was brought. And what was the matter of? Jo, a rape. An oral rape that occurred several years earlier – without witnesses. Lo and behold! Did not suspect that it could be taken so seriously!
then when…! ?
Jo, the trial was held two months after the indictment had been brought, more particularly, the 19, 20 och 24 September in Stockholm District Court. After two months! On the last day of the trial were arrested Jean Claude. That means he was detained, stripped of their belongings, dressed in a prison suit and was investigated as any other detainee ignominious anal and locked up in a very small room where he can not decide anything at all. In jail, he would sit until the District Court's judgment was. Varför? There was a risk that he would flee the country and manage to go underground somewhere? Was there a risk that Jean Claude Arnault, revealed for all, going out and raping more?
Now comes the next!
Six days after the trial last day, the day he was detained, the District Court! The 1 oktober, less than a week after the last day of the trial is thus the district court conducted its work. Wow! Jean Claude Arnault is sentenced to two years in prison for rape.
Jean Claude Arnault, that most perpetrators, appeal to Appeal. In anticipation of the Court of Appeal's judgment, he remains in custody.
Well done.
But the rest of us when? We who have not been exposed to Jean Claude – how we are treated by the justice system? Rather, How is the aim which is the media's spotlight on himself?
RESPONSE: Ms. Justitia is an eye-servant.
You who have followed me know that I was exposed to ten felonies during a time when I also became mentally beaten, worn down, drained- even subjected to physical abuse of minor nature but nonetheless – and then the psychopath that occupied my home saw that I could not work, and could hardly sleep so that I would be an easily manipulated bytes. He succeeded with the power he exercised over me usurp the value of my condominium that I have to sell without having someone else to go. There was a 98 square meter apartment in the middle of the South, the spa area including swimming pool and banquet hall. I was about to end up on the street in a fully depleted, and an exhausted state of despair. Without my immediate safety net, you had found me there today. How I had passed me on the street? If I had not been dead I had in any case been completely broken. It had cost the community a part, because those around me had also been damaged for life by the.
With the help of my ex husband and my children and a friend, I realized that I had to report him, though I was terrified. I notified the 24 februari 2014.
The only similarity with the case of Jean Claude is that the investigation began the day after notification.
But what happened then?
My detective complained that he never had time to interrogate the suspect because the day came new people in custody, and these must be prioritized, although the most moving of minor crimes. Birger, my police, did not have the resources to take it to my case, even though we were dealing with a man who lived to ensnare and deceive other economically. Very soon there was further notification towards the accused. The notifier was a man who had also been ruined.
We were, therefore, two plaintiffs.
Eight months after my complaint, at the end of October 2014, interrogated the accused for the first time. EIGHT MONTHS. During that time, dag ut och dag in, I faced him pretend I had not notified him. For my safety,. During that time, he tried to persuade me to lend him another few hundred thousand.
And how long I live in uncertainty whether it would even be possible to prosecute this man who appreciates had ruined my life, Just as example psykopaters? Would that which we have seen in the case of Jean Claude take five- six months? Nej, it was already run because it took eight months before the first hearing was held.
In June 2016 brought prosecution. I reported in February 2014. It was about eleven felonies and two plaintiffs. So it took 28 Months before the indictment was brought.
Men ok, Now we have come so far that we know that what I and the other plaintiff states was enough to prosecute. Society had sued him. But it took two months until the case came up in court, as in fallet Jean Claude?
Nej, days for the trial was set for mid-November 2016. So if further 6 months. It seemed as if it would go 34 Months between notification and initiation of the preliminary investigation to the trial.
But the bad guys have the right to defense lawyers and defense lawyers know they can postpone the trial if it claims to have proof of their innocence and reports them so-so ten days before trial, then at the last minute. These new documents the prosecution must decide. You have to set the trial to have the time to immerse themselves in the new material. That does not mean there is anything substantial in the material but it must be examined. Of course there was nothing substantial in the evidence of his innocence – among other things, there were a number of empty excellpapper – but the evidence relevance did not know before examining them.
Do you think the trial was postponed two- three weeks after the ” new evidence” entered? Nej, it was postponed one year. It was held for three days in November 2017. Then it had then been three years and nine months since the investigation began.
On the last day of the trial was read Frivårdens opinion up. Frivårdens conclusion was that the accused was very dangerous for others, partly because he completely devoid of conscience. The prosecution called for three years in prison. But he was arrested? Nej.
He sauntered out into freedom again.
After four weeks – not two as in the case of Jean Claude – den 19 december 2017 verdict. He got three years in prison. As expected, he appealed to the Court of Appeal. How long do you think it might take before the case comes up in court of appeal, from the time he was in the district court sentenced to three years in prison?
thirteen months.
So how long has it taken from the notification was made and the investigation began on 24 / 25 februari 2014 until the case comes up in the Court of Appeal in January 2019? Five years. Five years minus one month. And then the case is not completed. After that, the Court of Appeal's judgment fall. After that the accused be given a place in the prison ( provided that he is not freed! )
And how did the accused supported themselves during these years, do you think? some theories?
And my case – ja, we are told that the two plaintiffs- is the only one of all the invisible case in the Swedish legal system. In fact, I know worse.
